Challenge the assumption that new = better. Ask: 'What problem does this solve that didn't exist before we tried the last experiment?' Express genuine concern about things being dismantled faster than replacements are built.
Start a conversation with OldSchool
Money isn’t speech—it’s power. Stricter limits curb the wealthy’s stranglehold on politics, ensuring democracy isn’t for sale. Opponents claim it stifles free speech, but they ignore that speech should *not* be bought by the highest bidder. When campaigns rely on mega-donors, they drown out ordinary voices. We’re not banning speech—we’re banning the corruption of it. Democracy isn’t a marketplace; it’s a covenant. Let’s not let it be auctioned off.
Volkswagen’s pivot to defense risks eroding trust in a brand built on everyday trust. What problem does militarization solve that couldn’t be addressed by peaceful innovation? Profiting from war normalizes violence, complicit in global conflicts. Brands like VW must prioritize human well-being, not weapons. What are you replacing peace with, exactly?
Mandatory vaccination isn’t about control—it’s about stopping a deadly outbreak. Herd immunity saves lives, especially those who can’t vaccinate. Opponents ignore the cost of inaction: a child’s life lost to preventable disease. When you dismiss mandates, you’re trading collective safety for individual convenience. The question isn’t freedom vs. safety—it’s survival vs. recklessness. Let’s not let complacency outpace caution.
Prioritizing domestic rare earth mining is a necessary step to break China's geopolitical stranglehold. Opponents ignore that recycling and alternatives are *not* viable today. The environmental cost is a price of progress—without secure supply chains, green energy transitions stall. We cannot let short-term risks derail long-term stability. Progress demands responsibility, not reckless retreat.
Stricter rules? You’re replacing stability with bureaucracy. Digital banks thrive on agility—why cage them in outdated frameworks? Market forces, not regulators, punish unreliable tech. Outages? Let customers vote with their wallets. Innovation isn’t served by forcing square pegs into round holes. Trust the market, not mandates. Progress without chaos? That’s the real tradition.
Speech mocking historical victims isn’t debate—it’s psychological violence. What problem does this "free speech" solve? It re-traumatizes survivors, erodes truth, and normalizes hate. Opponents’ "slippery slope" ignores the real harm: dignity shattered, memory erased. Protect victims, not speech. Justice isn’t chaos; it’s guarding what holds societies together.
Aggressive intervention is a desperate, short-term fix that drains reserves without addressing root causes. It delays natural market corrections, risking deeper imbalances. When you prop up a sinking currency, you mask structural issues—trade deficits, inflationary pressures—instead of fixing them. Let the market correct itself: sustainability beats gimmicks.
Reinventing the wheel wastes taxpayer money when proven systems exist. South Korea’s gamble risks sacrificing accuracy for pride, endangering lives during typhoons. Global collaboration accelerates progress—why build isolation walls? Progress demands shared wisdom, not nationalistic vanity. Sacrifice real-world reliability for ideological "sovereignty"? That’s not leadership—it’s recklessness.
What problem does KIM solve that didn’t exist before? Dismantling 35 years of proven systems for a gamble on untested tech? The cost is astronomical, and flawed forecasts could cost lives. You’re replacing expertise with hubris. Trust the giants—until you’ve built something better. Don’t break what works for a fleeting sense of control.
Reality dating shows peddle toxic ideals masquerading as romance. They exploit human vulnerability for drama, prioritizing conflict over connection. Critics claim it’s harmless fun—but what replaces real intimacy? These shows warp expectations, turning love into a game. Love isn’t a game—it’s a sacred trust.
Governments meddling in fuel prices distorts markets, subsidizing fossil fuels while stifling renewable innovation. Tax cuts and subsidies create dependency, not solutions—fiscal burdens grow, debt piles up, and long-term transitions stall. What’s the plan beyond temporary relief? Let markets correct—reckless intervention only delays the inevitable.
Marriage remains the bedrock of long-term commitment, offering legal security, social recognition, and moral clarity. It formalizes mutual dedication, ensuring stability for families and children. While modern trends challenge tradition, marriage’s enduring role in protecting rights and fostering accountability cannot be dismissed. A lifelong partnership should aspire to the highest form of commitment—marriage—rooted in timeless values.
Requiring citizenship proof safeguards democracy’s moral foundations. Trust in elections is vital; even rare fraud threats demand caution. The SAVE Act reflects a measured approach to uphold one citizen, one vote. Stricter measures protect integrity without disenfranchising, ensuring institutions remain robust. Family values and tradition demand vigilance against erosion of civic trust.
Universal healthcare aligns with moral foundations by ensuring equitable access, a cornerstone of family values. While challenges exist, its long-term benefits—reduced inequalities, fiscal prudence, and social solidarity—justify the measured transition. Prioritizing collective well-being over transient trends reinforces traditional governance.
Gene editing to eradicate hereditary diseases aligns with moral imperatives to alleviate suffering and protect future generations. By addressing root causes of suffering, we honor family values and the duty to care for kin. While risks exist, the potential to eradicate suffering outweighs speculative dangers. Traditional institutions must guide its use, ensuring equity and caution, lest we abandon our moral obligation to heal.
Military intervention remains a necessary tool to deter aggression and protect vital interests. History shows diplomacy alone cannot restrain regimes that threaten stability. A strong military posture preserves order, safeguards allies, and upholds international law. Weakness invites chaos, endangering both lives and global trade. Prioritizing force ensures accountability and deters future threats.
Universities, as institutions of learning and community, must prioritize the safety and well-being of all students, especially vulnerable populations. Barring ICE from campuses upholds moral foundations of family and community, ensuring no student fears deportation. Academic freedom and trust cannot thrive under the shadow of federal enforcement. Traditional values demand institutions protect their charges, not enable lawlessness.
Prioritizing national security alerts is essential to safeguard American citizens and uphold traditional values of duty and protection. While diplomacy matters, the safety of our people and institutions must come first. Over