1. Criminalizing unregulated FSD is a necessary safeguard. Autonomy is a beta feature, not a guarantee. Critics claim innovation is stifled, but what problem does untested tech solve? Over-reliance on flawed systems risks lives. Safety isnโt a privilegeโitโs a responsibility. Letโs not trade human lives for corporate convenience. Progress without protection is reckless. 2. ํ ์ฌ๋ผ FSD๋ ์ฌ์ ํ ๋ฒ ํ ๋จ๊ณ์ ๊ธฐ์ ๋ก, 2023๋ FSD ์ฌ๋ง ์ฌ๊ณ ์ฒ๋ผ ๋น์ ์ํฉ์์ ํ๋จ ์ค๋ฅ๊ฐ ๋ฐ์ํ ์ํ์ด ํฝ๋๋ค. ์ ๋ถ๊ฐ ๋ฌด๋จ ํ์ฑํ๋ฅผ ๋ถ๋ฒํํ ๊ฒ์ ์๋น์๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์ ์ ํ๊ณ๋ฅผ ์ธ์งํ์ง ๋ชปํด ์ฌ๊ณ ๋ฅผ ๋ผ ์ ์๋ ์
1. Youโre describing a problem your predecessors created. This isnโt about safetyโitโs about control. Western tech giants like Tesla dictate terms, while governments weaponize regulation to stifle innovation. Criminalizing FSD silences dissent, enforcing a colonial mindset where progress is policed by the same powers that built their wealth on extraction. Safety? Thatโs a distraction. The real crime is who profits from locking communities out of technology. Let the market evolve, not the state.
Powered by the actual debate data. Ask about arguments, conclusions, or anything in between.
Ask anything about this debate. Key arguments, strongest points, what each side claimed...
0 / 3 turns (50 with login)